To: ACUActionDesk@conservative.org
I was very dissappointed to learn that ACU has allows the homosexual activist group "GOProud" to be a sponsor at the Conservative Political Action Conference.
Several groups including Family Research Council, Liberty Counsel, Concerned Women for America, American Principles Project, American Values, Capital Research Center, the Center for Military Readiness, and the National Organization for Marriage have already withdrawn support for CPAC -- and rightly so. I anticipate that additional conservative groups will withdraw support as they learn about the position ACU has taken.
There is nothing "conservative" about GOProud. They may hide behind saying they are "economic conservatives", but in reality they are a progressive group that exists solely to divide, confuse, conquer, and thereby neutralize the conservative movement. And it is working...
While I agree with ACU on economic conservative positions, I cannot support an organization that has no moral foundation.
I urge you to stop “gaying down” conservatism by embracing pro-homosexuality activism through CPAC.
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Republican Sellouts
Here is the complete list of GOP Senators who voted with Harry Reid and the Democrats to Repeal the ban on open homosexuality in the United States Armed Forces:
Mark Kirk (IL): 202-224-2854
Lisa Murkowski (AK): 202-224-6665
George Voinovich (OH): 202-224-3353
Olympia Snowe (ME): 202-224-5344
Susan Collins (ME): 202-224-2523
Scott Brown (MA): 202-224-4543
Richard Burr (NC): 202-224-3154
John Ensign (NE): 202-224-6244
Mark Kirk (IL): 202-224-2854
Lisa Murkowski (AK): 202-224-6665
George Voinovich (OH): 202-224-3353
Olympia Snowe (ME): 202-224-5344
Susan Collins (ME): 202-224-2523
Scott Brown (MA): 202-224-4543
Richard Burr (NC): 202-224-3154
John Ensign (NE): 202-224-6244
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Wal-Mart, SI Swimsuit Edition
Sent to: Wal-Mart Mr. Michael Duke, President, CEO
Dear Mr. Duke:
There are many of us who have faithfully expressed to Wal-Mart and you over the years that pornography is disgusting, degrading, addictive and destructive.
Wal-Mart recently made news for a 28 year old who masturbated to a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition and then wiped himself off on a toy.
Several years ago Wal-Mart did the right thing in removing SI Swimsuit Edition from its entrance ways and placed it back in the magazine rack. Some of your stores don’t carry SI Swimsuit for the obvious reasons: pornography is degrading to women. I urge you to establish a storewide policy and simply not sell SI Swimsuit Edition and SI
Swimsuit Edition calendars.
I look forward to hearing your response. Please do the right thing.
Dear Mr. Duke:
There are many of us who have faithfully expressed to Wal-Mart and you over the years that pornography is disgusting, degrading, addictive and destructive.
Wal-Mart recently made news for a 28 year old who masturbated to a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition and then wiped himself off on a toy.
Several years ago Wal-Mart did the right thing in removing SI Swimsuit Edition from its entrance ways and placed it back in the magazine rack. Some of your stores don’t carry SI Swimsuit for the obvious reasons: pornography is degrading to women. I urge you to establish a storewide policy and simply not sell SI Swimsuit Edition and SI
Swimsuit Edition calendars.
I look forward to hearing your response. Please do the right thing.
Petition Apple to restore Manhattan Declaration App
A petition to Steve Jobs, Apple, Inc., to restore the Manhattan Declaration App
We, the undersigned, urge you to reinstate the Manhattan Declaration App to the Apple app store.
The Manhattan Declaration, in a civil, reasoned, and respectful way, promotes the sanctity of every human life, traditional marriage, and religious freedom.
That Apple would deem the Manhattan Declaration as “offensive” is alarming and distressing. Some who are “offended” by the Manhattan Declaration can only be offended by the positions the Manhattan Declaration takes—positions based on biblical Christianity and affirmed by nearly half a million Christians representing dozens of denominations.
Despite the claims of some, the Declaration does not promote hate or homophobia. It is not anti-gay. Rather, it proclaims that all human beings are loved by God and are worthy of respect.
Civil discourse is a hallmark of a civilized and free society. Disagreement is not hate. We urge you and Apple, therefore, to promote communication and civil dialogue on these important social issues by reinstating the Manhattan Declaration App.
We, the undersigned, urge you to reinstate the Manhattan Declaration App to the Apple app store.
The Manhattan Declaration, in a civil, reasoned, and respectful way, promotes the sanctity of every human life, traditional marriage, and religious freedom.
That Apple would deem the Manhattan Declaration as “offensive” is alarming and distressing. Some who are “offended” by the Manhattan Declaration can only be offended by the positions the Manhattan Declaration takes—positions based on biblical Christianity and affirmed by nearly half a million Christians representing dozens of denominations.
Despite the claims of some, the Declaration does not promote hate or homophobia. It is not anti-gay. Rather, it proclaims that all human beings are loved by God and are worthy of respect.
Civil discourse is a hallmark of a civilized and free society. Disagreement is not hate. We urge you and Apple, therefore, to promote communication and civil dialogue on these important social issues by reinstating the Manhattan Declaration App.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Vote 'NO' on the DREAM Act
Sent to:
Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL)
Representative Jerry F. Costello (D-IL 12th)
CC: President Barack Obama (D)
As a resident in your state and district, I request that you vote "NO" on the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act or DREAM Act coming up for a vote in the next two weeks in the House and Senate.
* This bill provides amnesty for the children of illegal aliens who were brought to this country by their parents. It would also allow these children to serve as 'anchors' for citizenship for other family members thus allowing these illegal aliens a citizenship pathway as well.
* This bill would allow the States to provide a benefit to persons who reside in the United States illegally. Illegal aliens should not have the right to in-state tuition nor should the States be forced to provide illegal aliens in-state tuition.
* There is no public policy reason for the uniformed services to recruit or to allow entry into military service illegal aliens residing in this country. The military should not be used as a pathway to citizenship by those who entered this country illegally.
* If the proposed law passes, illegal alien students would have the right to financial aid such as student loans and work-study grants.
* If this bill passes it will create an 'incentive' for foreign nationals to cross our borders illegally and obtain citizenship through the use of their children.
* Equating two years of college with two years of military service minimizes the sacrifices of those who have served.
* The DREAM Act will cost taxpayers $6.2 billion and is likely to adversely affect American college students
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dream-act-will-cost-taxpayers-62-billion-111108004.html
Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL)
Representative Jerry F. Costello (D-IL 12th)
CC: President Barack Obama (D)
As a resident in your state and district, I request that you vote "NO" on the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act or DREAM Act coming up for a vote in the next two weeks in the House and Senate.
* This bill provides amnesty for the children of illegal aliens who were brought to this country by their parents. It would also allow these children to serve as 'anchors' for citizenship for other family members thus allowing these illegal aliens a citizenship pathway as well.
* This bill would allow the States to provide a benefit to persons who reside in the United States illegally. Illegal aliens should not have the right to in-state tuition nor should the States be forced to provide illegal aliens in-state tuition.
* There is no public policy reason for the uniformed services to recruit or to allow entry into military service illegal aliens residing in this country. The military should not be used as a pathway to citizenship by those who entered this country illegally.
* If the proposed law passes, illegal alien students would have the right to financial aid such as student loans and work-study grants.
* If this bill passes it will create an 'incentive' for foreign nationals to cross our borders illegally and obtain citizenship through the use of their children.
* Equating two years of college with two years of military service minimizes the sacrifices of those who have served.
* The DREAM Act will cost taxpayers $6.2 billion and is likely to adversely affect American college students
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dream-act-will-cost-taxpayers-62-billion-111108004.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)